BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
X-WR-CALNAME;VALUE=TEXT:Bridled by the Past? The ‘History Problem’ and Korea-Japan Security Relations
PRODID:-//Harvard events data//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:event_1553578_0
SUMMARY:Bridled by the Past? The ‘History Problem’ and Korea-Japan Security Relations
DESCRIPTION:<p><em>Kim Koo Forum on Korea Current Affairs</em></p><drupal-media data-entity-type="media" data-entity-uuid="df818ddf-770d-41e5-ac02-65dc3d27ca8c">&nbsp;</drupal-media><p><strong>Yongwook Ryu</strong><br>Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, The Australian National University</p><p>Chaired by&nbsp;<strong>Sun Joo Kim</strong>, Harvard-Yenching Professor of Korean History; Director, Korea Institute, Harvard University</p><p>Abstract</p><p>How does the ‘history problem’ affect Korea-Japan security relations?&nbsp;Korea-Japan security relations are something of an anomaly from the perspective of realism and liberal-institutionalism, two main theories of IR.&nbsp;From the realist perspective, the presence of a common security threat (North Korea), a common security concern (China) and a common alliance partner (USA) make the two countries natural security partners.&nbsp;From the liberal-institutionalist perspective, their shared socio-political values and the large and increasing volume of bilateral trade should have resulted in better security relations.&nbsp;Furthermore, the dramatic improvement in people-to-people exchanges in the past decade or so also bodes well for closer security cooperation between Korea and Japan.&nbsp;Yet, in reality the bilateral security relationship is minimal at best and ad hoc rather than institutionalized.&nbsp;As the 2012 General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) controversy demonstrates, it can be exceedingly difficult to conclude an even innocuous security arrangement between the two nations.&nbsp;I argue that the lack of security cooperation between the two nations is the result of the rise of the so-called “history problem” (역사문제) as a bilateral diplomatic issue and Korea’s democratization.&nbsp;The former has turned Korea-Japan security relations into an emotional issue outside of rational, strategic calculation, while the latter has made Korea’s foreign policy more vulnerable to domestic public pressure and demand.&nbsp;Hence in an environment of heightened tensions over the ‘history problem,’&nbsp;any advancement of Korea-Japan security relations will be extremely difficult especially when the issue is known to the public.&nbsp;I analyze the contents of Japan-related articles in&nbsp;Donga Ilbo&nbsp;from 1980 to 2010 to show that Korea’s Japan policy has increasingly been popularized and subject to public pressure.&nbsp;In addition, I present the analysis of a recent survey experiment conducted in Japan, to illustrate how the ‘history problem’ may worsen the Japanese public sentiments toward Korea and create a vicious cycle of worsening emotions between the two countries.</p><p><em>Co-sponsored by the Edwin O. Reischauer Institute of Japanese Studies and Weatherhead Center Program on U.S.-Japan Relations.</em></p><p><em>The Korea Institute acknowledges the generous support of the Kim Koo Foundation.</em></p><p><a href="https://vimeo.com/64246055">"Bridled by the Past? The 'History Problem' and Korea-Japan Security Relations"</a></p>
LOCATION:Thomas Chan-Soo Kang Room (S050), CGIS South Building, 1730 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
STATUS:CONFIRMED
DTSTART:20130328T203000Z
DTEND:20130328T220000Z
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR